On Friday, April 10 2009, David Lehman said: > On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 16:02 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > On 04/10/2009 03:40 PM, Jacek Danecki wrote: > > > This patch add new function to activate md containers/array. > > > > > > For isw format if we use incremental adding disk to the container we > > > need to add --no-degraded option to inhibits the startup of array unless > > > alle expected disks are present in array. > > > > > > > What if we really have a degraded array ? Then with this patch we will not > > activate it all. It does not seem completely unreasonable to not activate > > degraded arrays, but is that how we want to behave? Dave ? > > I'm open to discussion on this matter, but my first thought is that it > is okay for us to refuse to install to degraded arrays. If people > complain, the response is simple -- fix your shit. That's been the response for years to people wanting to install to degraded arrays :-) Jeremy _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
