On 04/06/2009 11:28 AM, Joel Granados Moreno wrote:
These were implemented to be consistent with the other classes in the
storage/devices.py file. Adding this tears down the dmraid device after
scanning. This presents trouble further on when parts of the installer
expect device nodes to be there.
Looks good, ack.
Regards,
Hans
---
storage/devices.py | 24 ------------------------
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/storage/devices.py b/storage/devices.py
index 04b562f..99306d9 100644
--- a/storage/devices.py
+++ b/storage/devices.py
@@ -2429,30 +2429,6 @@ class DMRaidArrayDevice(DiskDevice):
else:
self.sysfsPath = ''
- def teardown(self, recursive=None):
- """ Close, or tear down, a device. """
- log_method_call(self, self.name, status=self.status)
- if not self.exists:
- raise DeviceError("device has not been created")
-
- if self.format.exists:
- self.format.teardown()
-
- # This call already checks if the set is not active.
- self._raidSet.deactivate()
-
- def setup(self, intf=None):
- """ Open, or set up, a device. """
- log_method_call(self, self.name, status=self.status)
- if not self.exists:
- raise DeviceError("device has not been created")
-
- # This call already checks if the set is active.
- self._raidSet.activate(mknod=True)
-
- udev_settle()
-
-
class MultipathDevice(DMDevice):
""" A multipath device """
_type = "dm-multipath"
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
