On Wednesday, March 18 2009, Chris Lumens said: > > Looks good, but are we always going to have a kernel module (loaded) for > > all the possible mount commands we have, or will that get caught later > > if we just can't mount it? > > In the past, loader has ensured that the modules will be loaded. We > have a lot of calls to mlLoadModuleSet that take care of this. I don't > have any plans to change how that works in the future. Although if were to change that, it would let us get rid of a crappy duplication between loader and liveinst.sh for what modules we load Jeremy _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
