Re: [PATCH - storage]: Fix booty for dmraid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Booty was expecting the xxxxxxx part of /dev/xxxxxx paths instead of
> new storage device names, this patch fixes this, making booty work on
> dmraid with the new storage code.

I really hate having to pass a storage instance around all over the
place, but I don't see what else we can do right now.  I don't think we
can fix that until we get rid of util.py and deal with things as objects
instead of strings.

So, go ahead and commit this and we'll make things cleaner when we take
the chainsaw to booty next.

Also, thanks for testing a non-dmraid case to make sure it all worked.
This is touchy code.

- Chris

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux