On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 11:12 -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote: > In general, this looks okay. But it's going to mean that we're going to > have to deal with other changes when we, eg, change to i686. I think > we'd be better off doing the sed like I mentioned (so ARCH still ends up > being i386) and then if we're specifying glibc.i386 (or similar), we can > just do glibc.i?86 and I think the right thing should still happen > > But for the short-term, this is probably fine and then we can do the > other as a follow-on > > Jeremy > Yeah, this whole thing is a tad bit... fragile. It needs a serious rethink and rework, and that is coming, for now I'm just looking to bandaid it and keep things moving forward to a working rawhide, which is rather important as we near feature freeze. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
