On Wednesday, February 18 2009, Martin Gracik said: > there's no liveinst.sh in my rhel5-branch (at least I can't find it, maybe I'm doing something wrong?), so that's why I didn't change it. Aha! Mentioning the branch in these cases is really useful. There's nothing[1] really to tip the hat in that direction in the patch > About the raid list, I looked at how it's done in fedora branch, and took the logic from there. > I can change it back to the "old logic", just adding the RAID10 into the tupple. It should work... Aha, I see why the logic changed -- otherwise, RAID10 was matching for RAID1. But spelunking through commit logs (and then the referenced bug) was necessary. Hence why it's useful to have a good commit message for logic changes like this one rather than having them in the middle of a "support a new raid type" commit Jeremy [1] Well, I guess I could have looked at the tree-ish identifiers. But that's more time than it's usually worth _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
