On Wednesday, January 14 2009, Jeroen van Meeuwen said: > Jeremy Katz wrote: >> Do these actually need to be excluded now? I think that with recent yum (which we end up depending on anyway), if you have a package set which includes >> >> fedora-release >> generic-release >> >> and then you explicitly specify to install 'generic-release', provides >> which generic-release can do will get used "first" and then we'd only >> fall back to fedora-release if there was a provide which couldn't be >> satisfied. > > Well, upd-instroot selects "system-release" and "system-logos", and > let's YUM figure out whatever is the best match. The user (or > application triggering buildinstall) is not able to select the brand > packages. You're switching the use of system-release and system-logos to be $brandpkgname-release and -logos, though. I don't see anything left referring to the system-logos and system-release package. So with the explicit calling out of a brandpkgname, I'm not sure why we need both that *and* the excludes Jeremy _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
