On Dec 21, 2008, at 8:12 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:\
Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Dec 21, 2008, at 7:56 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Dec 21, 2008, at 5:45 AM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 18:40 -1000, David Cantrell wrote:
This patch removes anaconda's use of libdhcp, which also
means removing libdhcp4client and libdhcp6client.
Was there a reason these packages weren't culled from upd-
instroot ?
Is there a reason we list those packages there, instead of
providing a comps group?
We already have to update a file list in the script... having to
update both a script in anaconda and a comps group as opposed to
just the script means added work.
I said "instead".
We can't use a comps group to have a whitelist of the files we want
to include for the images.
The comps remark goes to PACKAGES, not KEEPFILES.
Just saying "this set of packages" isn't sufficient unless we're
okay with the install images increasing in size to 300 megs[1],
which, I'm really not
Having PACKAGES in comps isn't mutually exclusive with KEEPFILES
remaining in upd-instroot.
Then read what I wrote the first time...
"having to update both a script in anaconda" (for the case where there
are new files, which is the most common need to have to make any
changes) "and a comps groups" (which is what you're proposing) "as
opposed to just the script" (what we do now) "means added work"
Jeremy
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
