On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 19:36 +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: > Hi, > Now that in anaconda, during package selection, you can enable the > "Updates" repository for a given release, has anyone thought of the > following scenario? > - You select/enable the "Updates" repository > - Included in your selection of packages is package foo, available in > both the "Fedora/" repository as well as the "Updates" repository > - Package foo (from "Updates") now requires package bar, which is in > "Everything/" (not in "Fedora/"), but hasn't been updated since GA (e.g, > is not available in the "Updates" repository) > This would cause failed dependencies if the "Updates" repository is > enabled during installation, also enable the "Everything" repository. > Let me know if this doesn't make any sense. I've had this exact issue when trying to install RHEL 4.7 or 5.2 with an "updates" repository that has pre-4.7 or 5.2, respectively, because of the Firefox 1.5 -> XULRunner 1.9 + Firefox 3.0 split. -- Bryan J Smith - Senior Consultant - Red Hat GPS SE US mailto:bjs@xxxxxxxxxx +1 (407) 489-7013 (Mobile) mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx (non-RH/ext to Blackberry) ----------------------------------------------------- For every dollar you spend on Red Hat solutions, you not only fund the leading community development re- source, but you receive the #1 IT industry leader in corporate value. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
