On Dec 6, 2008, at 1:12 AM, David Cantrell wrote:
We are linking with glibc now, so use strverscmp() in place of the
rpmvercmp() function in loadermisc.c.
Looks fine, although there's some unrelated whitespace cleanups (not
that they need to be removed necessarily)
Jeremy
---
loader/Makefile | 2 +-
loader/dirbrowser.c | 2 +-
loader/loadermisc.c | 110 ++
+-----------------------------------------------
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 105 deletions(-)
diff --git a/loader/Makefile b/loader/Makefile
index e83d0f2..25dfb64 100644
--- a/loader/Makefile
+++ b/loader/Makefile
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ SOURCES = $(subst .o,.c,$(OBJS)) loader.c
LIBS +=
-CFLAGS += -DUSE_LOGDEV -DVERSION='"$(VERSION)"'
+CFLAGS += -DUSE_LOGDEV -DVERSION='"$(VERSION)"' -D_GNU_SOURCE
REALCC=gcc
# linuxrc + shutdown on s390, init everywhere else
diff --git a/loader/dirbrowser.c b/loader/dirbrowser.c
index 4d9c25c..6c713ec 100644
--- a/loader/dirbrowser.c
+++ b/loader/dirbrowser.c
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
static int simpleStringCmp(const void * a, const void * b) {
const char * first = *((const char **) a);
const char * second = *((const char **) b);
-
+
return strcmp(first, second);
}
#endif
diff --git a/loader/loadermisc.c b/loader/loadermisc.c
index a156007..03d26bb 100644
--- a/loader/loadermisc.c
+++ b/loader/loadermisc.c
@@ -86,107 +86,11 @@ int copyFile(char * source, char * dest) {
return rc;
}
-/* FIXME: when we only depend on glibc, we could use strvercmp
instead */
-/* compare alpha and numeric segments of two versions */
-/* return 1: a is newer than b */
-/* 0: a and b are the same version */
-/* -1: b is newer than a */
-static int rpmvercmp(const char * a, const char * b)
-{
- char oldch1, oldch2;
- char * str1, * str2;
- char * one, * two;
- int rc;
- int isnum;
-
- /* easy comparison to see if versions are identical */
- if (!strcmp(a, b)) return 0;
-
- str1 = alloca(strlen(a) + 1);
- str2 = alloca(strlen(b) + 1);
-
- strcpy(str1, a);
- strcpy(str2, b);
-
- one = str1;
- two = str2;
-
- /* loop through each version segment of str1 and str2 and
compare them */
- while (*one && *two) {
- while (*one && !isalnum(*one)) one++;
- while (*two && !isalnum(*two)) two++;
-
- str1 = one;
- str2 = two;
-
- /* grab first completely alpha or completely numeric segment */
- /* leave one and two pointing to the start of the alpha or numeric
*/
- /* segment and walk str1 and str2 to end of segment */
- if (isdigit(*str1)) {
- while (*str1 && isdigit(*str1)) str1++;
- while (*str2 && isdigit(*str2)) str2++;
- isnum = 1;
- } else {
- while (*str1 && isalpha(*str1)) str1++;
- while (*str2 && isalpha(*str2)) str2++;
- isnum = 0;
- }
-
- /* save character at the end of the alpha or numeric segment */
- /* so that they can be restored after the comparison */
- oldch1 = *str1;
- *str1 = '\0';
- oldch2 = *str2;
- *str2 = '\0';
-
- /* take care of the case where the two version segments are */
- /* different types: one numeric, the other alpha (i.e. empty) */
- if (one == str1) return -1; /* arbitrary */
- /* XXX See patch #60884 (and details) from bugzilla #50977. */
- if (two == str2) return (isnum ? 1 : -1);
-
- if (isnum) {
- /* this used to be done by converting the digit segments */
- /* to ints using atoi() - it's changed because long */
- /* digit segments can overflow an int - this should fix that. */
-
- /* throw away any leading zeros - it's a number, right? */
- while (*one == '0') one++;
- while (*two == '0') two++;
-
- /* whichever number has more digits wins */
- if (strlen(one) > strlen(two)) return 1;
- if (strlen(two) > strlen(one)) return -1;
- }
-
- /* strcmp will return which one is greater - even if the two */
- /* segments are alpha or if they are numeric. don't return */
- /* if they are equal because there might be more segments to */
- /* compare */
- rc = strcmp(one, two);
- if (rc) return (rc < 1 ? -1 : 1);
-
- /* restore character that was replaced by null above */
- *str1 = oldch1;
- one = str1;
- *str2 = oldch2;
- two = str2;
- }
-
- /* this catches the case where all numeric and alpha segments
have */
- /* compared identically but the segment sepparating characters
were */
- /* different */
- if ((!*one) && (!*two)) return 0;
-
- /* whichever version still has characters left over wins */
- if (!*one) return -1; else return 1;
-}
-
int simpleStringCmp(const void * a, const void * b) {
const char * first = *((const char **) a);
const char * second = *((const char **) b);
- return rpmvercmp(first, second);
+ return strverscmp(first, second);
}
/* look for available memory. note: won't ever report more than the
@@ -197,23 +101,23 @@ int totalMemory(void) {
char buf[4096];
char * chptr, * start;
int total = 0;
-
+
fd = open("/proc/meminfo", O_RDONLY);
if (fd < 0) {
logMessage(ERROR, "failed to open /proc/meminfo: %m");
return 0;
}
-
+
bytesRead = read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf) - 1);
if (bytesRead < 0) {
logMessage(ERROR, "failed to read from /proc/meminfo: %m");
close(fd);
return 0;
}
-
+
close(fd);
buf[bytesRead] = '\0';
-
+
chptr = buf;
while (*chptr && !total) {
if (strncmp(chptr, "MemTotal:", 9)) {
@@ -225,7 +129,7 @@ int totalMemory(void) {
while (*chptr && *chptr != '\n') chptr++;
*chptr = '\0';
-
+
while (!isdigit(*start) && *start) start++;
if (!*start) {
logMessage(WARNING, "no number appears after MemTotal
tag");
@@ -240,6 +144,6 @@ int totalMemory(void) {
}
logMessage(INFO, "%d kB are available", total);
-
+
return total;
}
--
1.6.0.3
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
