It looks ok to me in the sense that it will not break any old behavior that we had. Regards. ----- "Martin Sivak" <msivak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > See the discussion about #316631 (and the last comments about #316631) > and the patch at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=323077 > or in this email. > > Dell is really crying for this to happen and we have all the other > pieces in place, only this one is missing. > > Martin > _______________________________________________ > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list > Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list -- Joel Andres Granados Red Hat / Brno Czech Republic _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
