Can this one get applied? It's clear we're going to support kickstart in rescue mode so passing always the --kickstart to stage2 sounds sane now, isn't it? Even in the case if we choose not to support ks.cfg in rescue mode passing the parameter doesn't hurt, right? --- diff --git a/loader2/loader.c b/loader2/loader.c index 3b68a93..052cff9 100644 --- a/loader2/loader.c +++ b/loader2/loader.c @@ -2000,6 +2000,11 @@ int main(int argc, char ** argv) { if (FL_NOIPV6(flags)) *argptr++ = "--noipv6"; + if (FL_KICKSTART(flags)) { + *argptr++ = "--kickstart"; + *argptr++ = loaderData.ksFile; + } + if (FL_RESCUE(flags)) { *argptr++ = "--rescue"; if (FL_SERIAL(flags)) @@ -2020,11 +2025,6 @@ int main(int argc, char ** argv) { else if (FL_SELINUX(flags)) *argptr++ = "--selinux"; - if (FL_KICKSTART(flags)) { - *argptr++ = "--kickstart"; - *argptr++ = loaderData.ksFile; - } - if (FL_VIRTPCONSOLE(flags)) { *argptr++ = "--virtpconsole"; *argptr++ = virtpcon; Thanks, Alexander. _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list