> | - The repo configured in loader that gets passed to anaconda as method= > | is enabled, as is the regular Fedora release repo from the > | fedora-release package. This sounds like an exciting battle. I > | suppose it can be fixed a little bit with cost=, but I probably need > | a way to only enable one "base" repo. > > While you're at it any objections to make anaconda write the method= repo under > /etc/yum.repos.d/ as well ? I think this is the direction I want to head, yes. However I also have a big patch in the works regarding stage2=/method= to finish up the work I started last release, so I've left this untouched for now. > Does this get too complicated with RHEL where we > have Server, VT, Cluster, ClusterStorage repos as well? I'm going on the assumption that RHEL6 is going to be completely different from RHEL5 (we sure love to do that sort of thing) so I'm not going to worry about it for now. - Chris _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
