On May 21, 2008, at 8:12 AM, Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 08:13 -1000, David Cantrell wrote:
On May 21, 2008, at 8:08 AM, Jeremy Katz wrote:
Generating ifcfg-* files is still sane with NetworkManager, though.
It
uses them for the system-settings backend
Right, but don't we need to write NM_CONTROLLED=i_think_so|
probably_not to the ifcfg-* if the user wants "classic" config style
or not? And that would either need to be a switch somewhere (UI,
boot
arg, serial port dongle, kickstart flag, special spin of Fedora,
etc),
right?
The default if NetworkManager is around is that NM_CONTROLLED is
assumed
to be 1 if not present in the file, iirc
Oh right, durh....of course it wouldn't matter what the NM_CONTROLLED
value is if it's not even on the system.
I got up at 6:30 AM today, give me a break.
--
David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Red Hat / Honolulu, HI
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
