On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 22:00 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Jeremy Katz (katzj@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > The big question (in my mind) is if product.img continues to be the best > > mechanism for doing things like this. The sorts of things that get set > > with a product.img are things that are largely tied to the set of > > packages being installed. As we move the repo selection to be _after_ > > all of those things taking effect, I'm not as sure that product.img > > still makes sense. > > Where else will you put them? In the repo? That doesn't help things unless we move repo selection earlier. Which we don't really want to do. I'm not sure really what the answer is right now, but I think it does require looking at a) what's being changed b) the conditions under which those things want to be changed so that we can try to actually come up with a reasonable path to handling them. Which may just be falling back to a product.img like we do today and having it on boot.iso/cd1 Jeremy _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
