On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 22:14 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 18:01 -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > Was it only multilib on x86_64 in the past? If not, then it belongs in > > the upper splitpkgs tuple that we use to initially populate > > upgrade_remove_blacklist across all multilib arches > > That's why I posted, I wasn't sure what the difference was. This isn't > like the others listed, where the package itself was multilib and then > it grew a -libs subpackage, I do believe it just is no longer multilib. > It seemed like the other packages all grew -libs. I thought that's what > the other list was for, but obviously I was wrong. Nah, it exists because I got tired of adding the same packages to three different lines and sometimes forgetting to do one of them. This way we just do the really really architecture specific ones as "special" Jeremy _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
