On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 16:58 +0100, Joel Andres Granados wrote: > The use case I wish would not go is the treeinfo file pointing to the > different repodatas/repositories (Package1, Package2 ... ). As > opposed to finding them by hand. This would be handy for scripts > looking at the tree. Then again the scripts can also look into the > directories for the repodata dir... It also can reflect the > Packagedirs that were in the tree at the moment of running > buildinstall. As I stated before, not so relevant for fedora, but Honestly, I'm not sure that .treeinfo is really the format to provide that, though. For one thing, changing so that the above was the case would break some testing tools which use the product path to mean certain things. At the same time, those tools are happy without the product path there (at least, according to wwoods :) Jeremy _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
