On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 17:11 -0600, Douglas McClendon wrote: > Jeremy Katz wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 07:34 +0900, John Summerfield wrote: > >> The absolute minimum maintainable set should be "minimum." > >> > >> It needs a text editor, and the one history tells us should be there is > >> vi (not that johnny-come-lately nano that some install). > >> > >> I don't care whether the practical minimum is "base" or "core," and I > >> think I'm not alone in being unable to see the difference between the terms. > > > > The problem is that the word "minimum" is so heavily loaded (and > > differently loaded) that if you use it, you make no one happy. So, you > > pick different terms so that people can have the "minimum" they are > > looking for > > I was both joking, and making your point about this, regarding ed vs vi. > > But a real question is this- Can the parsing of the package list be > improved so that the original intuitive attempt at the beginning of this > thread- > > %packages > @base > -selinux-policy > -selinux-policy-targeted > -selinux-policy-mls > %end > > would actually work? It should be working -- I haven't tried it in anaconda in a while, but it definitely was working in livecd-creator when I was poking at the smallest installs back before the holiday. I'll try to fire up an install later in the weekend and try. But right now, it's 8 pm on Friday night and so I am going to enjoy the evening :-) Jeremy _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
