Jesse Keating wrote:
On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:17:55 -0600
Douglas McClendon <dmc.fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
yes please. Rationalizing and well-defining @core and @base sounds
great to me :) I mean, if there is a rational reason why selinux
policy should be explicitly listed in those, then fine, but I haven't
heard the reason yet, just the fact.
Fedora == SELinux in use. If you don't want SELinux, you're going to
have to make something that isn't Fedora.
Is that policy driven by technical merit, or politics? Is there any
chance that that policy could be softened to
( Fedora + @base ) == "SELinux in use"
with the explicit rationalization that people using a fedora system
generated by a kickstart with 'packages --no-base' really know what they
are getting themselves into, and in general are doing so because they
want to make all decisions for themselves about which packages to
explicitly install which aren't required to run a useful minimal system?
Didn't think so...
-dmc
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
