On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 16:27 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 03:17:55PM -0600, Douglas McClendon wrote: > > >With those lists in hand, we could work on rationalizing @core and > > >@base (because they're not really well-defined) and perhaps collapse > > >them into one group. > > yes please. Rationalizing and well-defining @core and @base sounds > > great to me :) I mean, if there is a rational reason why selinux policy > > should be explicitly listed in those, then fine, but I haven't heard the > > reason yet, just the fact. > > I think a rational split is: You have the right idea, but Base and Core backwards. And really, that's where they stand today[1]. An install with just @core had next to nothing which could be removed after the install completed. And most of the things which could were things which are used at install-time (eg, lokkit, etc). If you shrink the locale archive by cutting it down to just what you want, remove some translations you get to under 200 megs iirc Jeremy [1] Well, I haven't looked at base as closely at core in a little while. _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
