Re: pungi/mkisofs for ppc on x64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



John Summerfield (debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> We're making process, but pardon me if I ask "why?" again. I can understand 
> that someone might have chosen to implement that way, but is this choice 
> necessary? Could binaries running on Intellish hardware not do the needed 
> work?

Becuase otherwise involves writing really grody code that uses elfutils
to parse out all the DT_NEEDEDs. We also run various things like ldconfig,
icon caching, fc-cache, im module listings, etc. in the root for the
install images.

Bill

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux