Re: [RFC PATCH] De-kudzuification of anaconda, stage 1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeremy Katz (katzj@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > There are only so many exceptions you logically want to handle, though -
> > if the daemon isn't there or isn't responding, it's logically no different
> > than some command not existing in the install image, or parted crashing, etc.
> 
> It's far better to catch an exception and log that there was an error
> writing out a network config than to crash in the middle of writing it
> out.

Technically, this is in network device list generation, anyway. You can
continue with just no network devices, but the net effect for the user is
pretty much the same.

Bill

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux