Jeremy Katz (katzj@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 18:24 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > + for i in 05-udev-early.rules 40-redhat.rules > > 50-udev-default.rules 64-device-mapper.rules 64-md-raid.rules > > 80-drivers.rules 95-udev-late.rules ; > > This is going to be incredibly fragile as there's nothing that says the > rule names are going to stay the same over time and I've already seen > the name of 50-udev-default.rules change once in the past six months. > Any real reason not to just take everything? Fewer meaningless errors from rules that we don't care about. But we certainly could take everything. Bill _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
