On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 10:53:11 -0400 Christopher Boumenot <boumenot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It would be nice to know what post script is executing, but do to > their nature that is impossible. Would you accept a patch that added > --name argument to %post (and %pre) to tell Anaconda what the > scriptlet's name is? I am open to other suggestions. Why can't the script itself output debug info like this? %pre and %post are treated as a single script. Have echos or some such saying "calling foo" then "calling bar" as you call other scripts from the %pre/%post stuff. Also those scripts your calling could in turn be calling yet other things, so the onus of debugging I think clearly lies upon the authors of the script. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
