On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 22:03 -0500, Matt Wilson wrote: > You can apply this patch instead of the one that adds rpm-stub.py. Committed basically this. I went ahead and removed some other baggage in a few places instead of the stubbing. The other thing I didn't do is commit the part for traceonly, because I instead want to kill traceonly mode. I really don't think it's saving us that much these days, especially for the amount of pain it causes. Also, instead of a constant for the backend, does it make more sense to try to auto-determine the backend, perhaps based off of product info? Jeremy
