On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 11:45 +0800, John Summerfied wrote: > Patrick Mansfield wrote: > > > > > I don't know, it is Jeremy's call. We get more exposure posting here. > > In Bugzilla, the patches are part of the official record of problems and > changes to the product. > If Jeremy cleans out his mailbox the patches (except for the archives, > which I'd not regard as part of the official record) are lost. > > Besides, _I_ don't want the patches. I'm here to ask the odd question, > answer the odd question and learn. Probably, most people here don't want > the patches. Discussion of proposed large patches such as iscsi is better on list IMO. Back and forth about style is easier when you can comment inline. When things are blessed/reviewed, the proposer should put them in bugzilla to prevent loss. This is a development list - you should expect to see patches! Paul
