On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 01:19 -0500, Matt Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 04:24:44PM +1100, Alan Milligan wrote: > > > > At the moment, we have to cut new anaconda packages for each derivative > > - - with this change, we wouldn't need to. Another less glamorous option > > could be to pass this as a parameter to buildinstall, but I'd prefer to > > use the knowledge contained in the RPM's. > > > > Anyone care to comment? Any chance of getting this into FC5? > > rBuilder Online[1] pulls image files from a anaconda-custom package, > which can contain updated .py files (to define install classes) and > images for anaconda. Are you doing this by putting the changed stuff inside of a product.img or are you regenerating the entire stage2.img each time? Jeremy
