On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 07:17 -0400, Paul Nasrat wrote:
> I believe the issue is related to the fact that if we are Auto/None for the
> raidminor here and we're not testing for that. Carrying on the install without
> trying to get the edit screen works happily. I can catch the TypeError (or explicitly test), but the later getRequestByDeviceName("Auto") is going to fail. The requests don't get minors until we do toEntry().
Almost certainly... adding of auto vs explicit raid minors definitely
happened after the fact and I'm not at all surprised that weird
subtleties exist due to that.
> This is making me think do we need to look at how we currently track
> minors in partRequests.
Open to suggestions :-)
Jeremy
