On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 04:07, Akbar S. Ahmed wrote: > Pavel Ivanov wrote: > > 2) Is there any anaconda documentation? > Alexander Rau wrote: > > 2) I/We wish > > I've seen the question regarding Anaconda docs a million times. > Shouldn't this be added to the top of the documentation project needs. It's all a matter of people with time and interest... as I've said, I'm more than willing to look over stuff, I just don't really have time to write things. > Perhaps a good place to start is to document what the future feature > direction will be and to start docs on the new code as it is added. Then > slowly over time "retrofit" the docs to cover older code. My current feature direction is "get things working with 2.6" :-) Beyond that, I have a few ideas, but I need to flesh them out a little more before talking much about them. And figure out what actually appears to be doable with various timeframes. I don't intentionally go out with the plan of changing buildinstall, etc every release, it just tends to happen :/ > Does anyone know if Red Hat has docs on this internally? Are they > planning on releasing this info (if they have it) as part of the Fedora > project? Nope, if we had docs, I would have put them out there already. Most of the "documentation" at this point is bottled up in my head (and a few other people's) Jeremy
