Jeremy, Our AS 2.1 Update 2 CDs include 7.2-68_ELAS, but the RHN channel only has 7.2-33AS. Why would the RHN channel have the old, broken version? I was using the latest version available via RHN, not realizing my CDs actually had a _NEWER_ version. :( /Brian/ On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 16:27, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 16:03, Brian Long wrote: > > I'm trying to buildinstall the 2.4.9-e.27 boot floppies and the latest > > AS 2.1 anaconda-runtime does not make the .buildstamp file inside > > mk-images. If I look at RH 7.3 mk-images, it has various statements to > > create .buildstamp. > > > > Is this a known bug in AS 2.1 anaconda-runtime? Does anyone have a > > patch available to make this work? > > Which version of anaconda (package version). The RHEL 2.1 anaconda is > based off of the Red Hat Linux 7.2 anaconda. But I backported the > buildstamp stuff in anaconda-7.2-60_ELAS > > Cheers, > > Jeremy > > > _______________________________________________ > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list > Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list -- Brian Long | | | Americas IT Hosting Sys Admin | .|||. .|||. Cisco Linux Developer | ..:|||||||:...:|||||||:.. Phone: (919) 392-7363 | C i s c o S y s t e m s
