Re: overrun with 'arecord' - why ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 21:12:52 -0700 (PDT)
Bill Unruh <unruh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[snip]
> Yes, it certainly is a bug. Thus it may also be true that there is no underrun
> either. 
> (actually, It is not clear to me what an underrun means for recording. So what
> if the buffer is empty)
[snip]

There _are_ overruns (yes, overruns and not underruns). When I do the real
thing (playback + capture simultaneously), I also observe the recorded signal
plotting it in GNU Octave or Audacity. I do see missing pieces of data. I.e.
recording a 'sin' burst in case of overrun I see the recorded burst to be
shorter than the stimulus (playback) burst.

The burst is zero-padded both in the beginning and at the end, so I know it's
not just a too early terminated or too late started recording.

So, to me the overrun term looks quite appropriate - the capture part is
overrun by data from ADC and in such cases doesn't cope with writing the
captured data to disk.

Regards,
  Sergei.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Xperia(TM) PLAY
It's a major breakthrough. An authentic gaming
smartphone on the nation's most reliable network.
And it wants your games.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-sfdev
_______________________________________________
Alsa-user mailing list
Alsa-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user


[Index of Archives]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux