Andrea Arcangeli wrote, on 24/02/11 03:25: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 05:24:32PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 04:17:44AM +1030, Arthur Marsh wrote: >>> OK, these patches applied together against upstream didn't cause a crash >>> but I did observe: >>> >>> significant slowdowns of MIDI playback (moreso than in previous cases, >>> and with less than 20 Meg of swap file in use); >>> >>> kswapd0 sharing equal top place in CPU usage at times (e.g. 20 percent). >>> >>> If I should try only one of the patches or something else entirely, >>> please let me know. >> >> Yes, with irq off, schedule won't run and need_resched won't get set. >> >> So let's try this. >> >> In case this doesn't fix I definitely give it up with compaction in >> kswapd as GFP_ATOMIC will likely not get an huge benefit out of >> compaction anyway because 1) the allocations from GFP_ATOMIC are >> likely short lived, 2) the cost of the compaction scan loop + >> migration may be higher than the benefit we get from jumbo frames >> >> So if this doesn't fix it, I'll already post a definitive fix that >> removes compaction from kswapd (but leaves it enabled for direct >> reclaim for all order sizes including kernel stack). I already >> verified that this solves not just the midi latency issue but the >> other server benchmark that I'm dealing with. Then we can think at >> compaction+kswapd later for 2.6.39 but I think we need to close this >> kswapd issue in time for 2.6.38. So if the below isn't enough the next >> patch should be applied. I'll get those two patches tested in the >> server load too, and I'll let you know how the results are when it >> finishes. >> >> Please apply also the attached "kswapd-high-wmark" before the below >> one. >> + if (need_resched() || spin_is_contended(&zone->lru_lock)) { >> + if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) >> + break; > > this is compaction-kswapd-2, to fix the buglet same as in the other > patch. > > In short (to avoid confusion) it'll be helpful if you can test > compaction-kswapd-2 vs compaction-no-kswapd-3 and let us know if both > are ok or if only compaction-no-kswapd-3 is ok. compaction-no-kswapd-3 > should help, compaction-kswapd-2 I'm unsure. And as usual I suggest to > apply kswapd-high-wmark (attached to previous emails) _before_ > applying both patches. kswapd-high_wmark + compaction-kswapd-2 - kswapd0 CPU up to 11 percent and slightly less pronounced slowdowns of MIDI playback compared to previous patches. kswapd-high_wmark + compaction-no-kswapd-3 - kswapd0 CPU up to 2.3 percent and no noticable slowdown of MIDI playback. Mel Gorman's mm/compaction.c patch - kswapd0 CPU up to 20 percent and no noticable slowdown of MIDI playback. Thanks everyone for the help with this. Arthur. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Software Download: Index, Search & Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk. Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data generated by your applications, servers and devices whether physical, virtual or in the cloud. Deliver compliance at lower cost and gain new business insights. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Alsa-user mailing list Alsa-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user