Re: Playing 96k/24bit wave files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi.

I have not read/understand what you are trying to explain because my
english level is not native language (sorry). But i can tell you
something:

For audio works, i recommend you using JACK (with a realtime kernel).

Gracias.
Chau!

On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 11:07 +0000, Jim Lesurf wrote: 
> Hi,
> 
> This is my first posting to the email list. I have looked at the archives,
> but apologies if the following is too far OT or an old chestnut.
> 
> I'm experimenting with two different USB sound (playing) devices that
> should be capable of asynchronous transfers up to and including 96k/24bit.
> The following is when testing a Halide Bridge. Using two systems, but the
> one relevant here is a Shuttle running Ubuntu.
> 
> I've successfully arranged for the device(s) I'm trying out to be the
> 'default' alsa device for playing by including
> 
> pcm.!default {
> type plug
> slave {
> pcm "hw:2"
> channels 2
> format S24_3LE
> }
> }
> 
> in my 'asoundrc' file. (NB there are two other 'soundcards' present and the
> one I'm testing expect S24_3LE and is hw:2.)
> 
> The Halide Bridge converts USB into (coax) SPDIF. 
> 
> If I play a 96k/24 LPCM wave file with the aplay command I can record its
> SPDIF output with an audio recorder and compare it sample-by-sample with
> the file I played. Using aplay, the result for the brief tests so far show
> bit-for-bit correct output values. So that looks like the Bridge and
> Shuttle hardware are working OK.
> 
> However if I use Audacious to play a file, the result comes out as 16 bit
> per sample. i.e. the least significant byte is being ignored/zerod. I have
> selected the '24 bit' output option, and specified not to use its volume
> control. I have also selected the 'advanced' option to 'avoid processing'
> and have selected the default ALSA output.
> 
> Have I missed something with Audacious? Or is this a known problem? I've
> found on the web mentions of making sure you select the 24bit output and
> the 'avoid processing'. And apart from the missing bottom 8 bits the values
> don't immediately look 'altered' in other ways. Not looked yet in detail
> though as the loss of the lowest bytes is the obvious symptom!
> 
> Can give more details if asked, but at present not sure what to add and
> wish to avoid taking up too much space if this is OT or a chestnut.
> 
> Thanks in advance for any help,
> 
> Jim
> 



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)!
Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free!
Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires 
February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Alsa-user mailing list
Alsa-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user


[Index of Archives]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux