Re: Are hw & plughw different?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> Can you tell me if hw:0,0 is exactly equivalent to the "default" ALSA
>> device *if* dmix is disabled with the following in /etc/asound.conf:
>>
>> pcm.!default {
>> type plug
>> slave.pcm hw
>> }
>
> No hw:0,0 talks directly to hardware (without conversions. Plug is a plugin to
> convert the format and sampling rate in order to connect the input to the
> output.
> So the conf you wrote is equivalent to plughw:0,0 not to hw:0,0.
>
> Anyway I recomend to use the conf you quoted or something like the following
> (which is more readable) as a default device in order to let applications play
> any kind of sound (44khz, 48khz, 8bit and so on)
>
> pcm.digital
>        {
>        type hw
>        card 0
>        device 0
> }
>
> pcm.!default {
>        type plug
>        slave.pcm digital
> }

I'm trying to write a config in asound.conf that is equivalent to
hw:0,0.  Is what you wrote above equivalent to hw or plughw?  If
plughw, how would you write one that is equivalent to hw?

- Grant

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_______________________________________________
Alsa-user mailing list
Alsa-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user


[Index of Archives]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux