Paulo Moura Guedes wrote: > BTW, Benchmark DAC1 resamples internally to 110kHz: > > "On the question of: Why does the DAC1 re-sample to 110 kHz? Here is > why: it is the highest frequency to maintain the full oversampling of > the D-A chip. EVERY D-to-A chip on the market cuts the oversampling rate > in half to accommodate 192 kHz. So these guys are running the DAC at 96 kHz + 14.6%? Sounds to me like having an 'overclocked' system, very close to (or maybe even past) the limits of the specs. How much headroom (clock-wise) will there be left for e.g. temperature fluctuations or component tolerances? The argument about 192 kHz is true, but why not run the DAC at the 'normal' 96 kHz then? I would prefer a 48 -> 96 conversion over a 48 -> 110 conversion!. And how about interference: won't a 96 -> 110 conversion give any interference at 14 kHz? Right in the audible band! Matthijs ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Alsa-user mailing list Alsa-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-user
