I'm not very well versed in programming languages, but I did some investigations. It looks like /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/lib389/backend.py invokes self._instance.get_db_lib get_db_lib is defined in /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/lib389/__init__.py Here, at line 873 def get_db_lib(self): ... return get_default_db_lib() get_default_db_lib is defined in /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/lib389/utils.py and it return os.getenv('NSSLAPD_DB_LIB', default=DEFAULT_DB_LIB) Since NSSLAPD_DB_LIB is not defined as an environment variable, DEFAULT_DB_LIB i returned. DEFAULT_DB_LIB is defined in /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/lib389/_constants.py and the value is DEFAULT_DB_LIB = 'bdb' So in my case it looks like DEFAULT_DB_LIB is always used when I use dsctl healthcheck If I put DEFAULT_DB_LIB = 'mdb' in _constants.py, then healthcheck stops complaining. Thanks, A. On Fri, 2024-08-30 at 17:33 +0200, Pierre Rogier wrote: > For healthcheck, I see 2 possibilities: > [1] NSSLAPD_DB_LIB=bdb is set in your environment (saying lib389 > that bdb is used ...) > [2] There is a bug somewhere. (which seems a bit weird since 'dsconf > supplier1 backend config get' is working as expected ...) > BTW, Which exact 389-ds-base version are you using ? and on > which platform ? > -- _______________________________________________ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue