I have a cascading multi setup 389-ds.
I observed that on my supplier, hub and consumer are doing good in terms of replication.
They are healthy.
What I observe is supplier and hub is doing good with replication and size of changelog.db for one of the backend suffix is less.
But, consumer changelog.db disk space utilization is more around 34 Gb and supplier and hub changelog.db disk space utilization is 40 mb.
What could be the issue and why it's utilizing that high disk space for changelog.db ?
And, why a consumer is holding changelog.db file.. where could be the issue.
Thank you.
-- _______________________________________________ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
