Re: 389 DS 2.3.6 on RHEL 9 replication between 2.3.6 and 1.3.9 389DS

[Mark Reynolds <mareynol@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Alex,

It definitely works, and that error means you did not "initialize" your new server/replica.  Looks like you just setup a replication agreement, but not initialize the remote replica.  Once initialized the new server will have the same database generation id and replication updates will flow.

HTH,
Mark

On 4/2/24 5:26 PM, Nazarenko, Alexander wrote:

Hello colleagues,

 

 

We plan to move our LDAP service from 389DS 1.3.9 on RHEL7 to 389 DS 2.3.6 on RHEL 9 platform.

 

Question: is it possible to attach a 389 DS 2.3.6 consumer to 389DS 1.3.9 supplier for seamless transition, and get the data replicated in real time?

 

My first attempt produced an error about different database versions.

Maybe it is not supposed to work?

 

Thank you,

- Alex

 

 

 

--
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

-- 
Identity Management Development Team
  

--
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue