--You may follow the doc to configure TLS on your both suppliers [1] and check the trusted CA on both side [2]. On troubleshooting side you may look at [3]
[1] https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/12/html/securing_red_hat_directory_server/assembly_enabling-tls-encrypted-connections-to-directory-server_securing-rhds#doc-wrapper
[2] https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/12/html/securing_red_hat_directory_server/assembly_changing-the-ca-trust-flagssecuring-rhds#doc-wrapper
[3] https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_directory_server/12/html/configuring_and_managing_replication/assembly_troubleshooting-replication-related-problems_configuring-and-managing-replication
On 1/25/24 23:55, Ciara Gadsden wrote:
Idk how to do that lol
Sent from my Boost Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
Get Outlook for Android
From: Simon Pichugin <spichugi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2024 5:44:57 PM
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project. <389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: alexander_nazarenko@xxxxxxxxxxx <alexander_nazarenko@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [389-users] Re: 389 DS 2.3.6 on RHEL 9 replication over TLSHello Alex,
I think we need a bit more information here.
First of all, could you please run the "dsconf repl-agmt create" (LDAPS one) with "-v" flag? It will give a detailed verbose output.
Also, I recommend checking the server's error and access log for more information why it fails (additionally, you may enable at least 16384+8192 (Default + Replication debugging) in nsslapd-errorlog-level).
As for possible issues and actions, at first glance, I recommend checking that the TLS certificates used are correctly installed and trusted on both the supplier and consumer instances. It's important that the instances trust each other; even though ldapsearch (OpenLDAP client) on the supplier already trusts the consumer machine, it's not enough.
Sincerely,
Simon
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 1:07 PM Nazarenko, Alexander <alexander_nazarenko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
--Hello colleagues,
Lately we started looking into 389 DS 2.3.6 on RHEL 9 platform.
We followed instructions Configuring and managing replication on Red Hat site to establish replication between two remote instances,
The instances where previously configured to support TLS channel on port 636 (Enabling TLS-encrypted connections to Directory Server) , and we made sure ldapsearch is working with LDAPS:// protocol with the certificate verification (TLS_REQCERT demand).
The following issue with the replication over TLS was observed:
After we ran the command below to configure secure replication:
dsconf -D "cn=Directory Manager" -w *** ldaps://server.example.edu repl-agmt create --suffix "dc=example,dc=com" --host "consumer.example.edu" --port 636 --conn-protocol=LDAPS --bind-dn "cn=replication manager,cn=config" --bind-passwd "***" --bind-method=SIMPLE --init consumer.example.edu-RO
the error occurred:
Error (-1) Problem connecting to replica - LDAP error: Can't contact LDAP server (connection error)
We double-checked that after we configure clear text replication with the command:
dsconf -D "cn=Directory Manager" -w *** ldaps://server.example.edu repl-agmt create --suffix "dc=example,dc=com" --host "consumer.example.edu" --port 389 --conn-protocol=LDAP --bind-dn "cn=replication manager,cn=config" --bind-passwd "***" --bind-method=SIMPLE --init 10.140.133.36-RO
no problem occurred, and the replication completed successfully.
My question is whether this means the replication over TLS required different config steps, and if yes – what they are?
Thank you,
- Alex
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
-- _______________________________________________ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
-- _______________________________________________ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
