Re: Crash with SEGV after compacting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

Many thanks for the quick analysis!

> The crash is already fixed in 1.4.4 with 
> https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/4778
> The fix was about scheduling of compaction but revisit this part of code 
> and actually fixed this crash.

I will raise the issue with Debian and see whether they would be willing to update the package in Debian 11 / bullseye.
(https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1029040 is indirectly related, which means that the OP and us are not the only ones affected)

My understanding is that updating 389-ds-base to v1.4.4.19 (the latest tag I could find on github, https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/tree/389-ds-base-1.4.4.19) would contain this fix, right ?

> I fully agree with Mark suggestion to move to 2.x as this branch is not 
> maintained except for few fixes like this one.

Yes, definitely. Debian 12 / bookworm is providing v2.3.1 and has recently become the new Debian stable. But upgrading obviously impacts other packages and we are still on RHEL 8 (and therefore 389-ds v1.4.3.*) for the IPA servers. While we have already successfully tested Debian 12 + RHEL 9 with our application, it did raise some unrelated issues with the IPA client (which are now solved in Debian 12 and on their way to RHEL 8 and 9).

So, we still have to live with the current setup for a few months, and if we don't get this fixed in Debian 11, I am thinking of what kind of workaround we could put in place, and I would be grateful for a quick feedback from your side :

- Is it reasonable to configure a very long delay for the compacting?
- Or should we rather rather restart dirsrv periodically in order to reset the next delay?

I appreciate that neither is ideal, but this are small instances which can be down from time to time (typically at night) and a restart of the LDAP server is transparent for the application, as long as no one is trying to log in while it is down.

Thanks again for your help,

Mathieu
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux