In theory you should be able to have the same behavior:
Here is a small table that summarizes the behavior.
Old Version | New version | |||
subsuffix | 2 suffixes | subsuffix | 2 suffixes | |
subtree search behavior on “parent” suffix | see entries on both suffix | see only parent suffix | see entries on both suffix | see only parent suffix |
subsuffix mapping tree attribute: nsslapd-parent-suffix | set | unset | ignored | ignored |
subsuffix mapping tree attribute: orphan | N/A | N/A | unset | set |
default when using dsconf backend create –suffix subsuffix without setting –parent-suffix |
No | Yes | Yes | No |
Regards,
Pierre
_______________________________________________Hello,
We are having an issue when using an ldap browser or even the ldapsearch command subsuffixes that are on a separate backend database are not displayed when specifying the parent suffix as the base dn. In previous versions when specifying the parent suffix as the base dn the subsuffixes were listed. Currently only entries related to the primary userRoot database are displayed. The root dse also does not display the subsuffixes.
If we run the "dsconf INSTANCE backend suffix set --enable-orphan dbname" command the missing suffix appears in the root dse but still does not appear in when listing the entries in the base dn.
The subsuffixes are accessible if we specify them as the base dn or access them via the built in ldap browser vi cockpit.
You can perform the following ldap search on V11 and V12 and will see the differences in the results:
ldapsearch -D "cn=manager" -W -b "dc=example,dc=com" -s one -x "(objectclass=*)" dn
V11 returns
# numResponses: 15
# numEntries: 14
V12 returns
# numResponses: 12
# numEntries: 11
Version we have installed
389-ds-base-libs-2.2.6-2.el8.x86_64
389-ds-base-2.2.6-2.el8.x86_64
Previous versions we were running
389-ds-base-libs-1.4.3.13-1
389-ds-base-1.4.3.13-1
Jason Villarroel
Systems Administrator
Florida International University
Division of Information Technology – Enterprise Systems
PC 120
305-348-2687 (Office)
305-348-3686 (Fax)
Division of Information Technology staff will never ask for your password.
Never email your password or share confidential information in emails.
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
389 Directory Server Development Team
_______________________________________________ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue