Re: 389 Ldap Cleanallruv Replica Crash

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It could be related to:


https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/5743


Can you please try and get a stack trace of the crash/core?


https://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/FAQ/faq.html#sts=Debugging%C2%A0Crashes


Thanks,
Mark


On 5/2/23 3:00 PM, Juan Quintanilla wrote:
Hi,

I recently installed 389-ds-base-libs-2.2.6-2.el8.x86_64 and 389-ds-base-2.2.6-2.el8.x86_64 on an ALma Linux 8 Server, but I'm encountering an issue with removing offline replicas from our existing 389 Ldap.

When the command below is executed on one of the suppliers:

dsconf INSTANCE_NAME repl-tasks cleanallruv --suffix "ou=sample,dc=test,dc=dom" --replica-id 20 --force-cleaning

The entry is removed from the ldap supplier, and when the change is sent to the secondary supplier it is also removed with no problem.  The issue is when the change is sent to the consumer, the slapd process will instantly crash.  When the consumer instance is brought back up the entry that needed to be removed is gone.

Has anyone encountered a similar issue with the consumers crashing during a cleanallruv request or cleanruv?

I also tried running a cleanruv task on each server, suppliers have no issue. When the command is run on the readonly consumers the slapd process crashes.

ldapmodify -x -D "cn=manager" -W <<EOF
dn: cn=replica,cn=ou\3Dsample\2Cdc\3Dtest\2Cdc\3Ddom,cn=mapping tree,cn=config
changetype: modify
replace: nsds5task
nsds5task: CLEANRUV20
EOF

There is no recorded error in the logs to indicate the reason for the crash.

Thanks!

Juan


_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
-- 
Directory Server Development Team
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux