On Fri, 2023-04-21 at 05:50 +0000, dweller dweller wrote: > Oops, I ment to post this diagram > https://pastebin.com/HZZjCtFJ > > The vision was, I guess, for each common-replica to have a connection with its > own downstream client's replica, in order to not exceed 4 replication > agreements per replica. You might consider a replication hub and spoke model. Where all replication agreements point to the replication hub nodes. perhaps something like this would improve replication performance? +--+ +--+ +--+ +--+ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | +--+ +--+ +--+ +--+ | +---+ +---+ | | | | | | | +--->| | | |<---+ replication hub +-------->| | | | <------+ | +---+ +---+ | | | +--++ +--+ +--+++--+ | | | | | || | | | | | | || | +---+ +--+ +--++---+ _______________________________________________ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
