> On 19 Apr 2023, at 15:53, Johannes Kastl <kastl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi William, > > thanks for the help. > > On 19.04.23 at 01:52 William Brown wrote: > >> dsctl requires root/dirsrv because it assumes you are on the same host as the dirsrv instance. There are three commands: > > Sorry, but then the documenation is... having need for improvement. Which docs are you referring to here? For example: https://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/howto/quickstart.html#our-commands Pretty clearly states it :) > I have misunderstood the purpose of the tools or the distinction between them. That's okay - it's why they are seperate tools at all. > > Off the top if my head I am not sure what good "dsctl dsrc ..." is, if this does not work without a local instance? > >> dsctl - requires root/dirsrv, and tries to manipulate an instance directly via local system actions, things like dse.ldif and ldapi. It bypasses the uri provided, it's trying to "manage the system". >> dsconf - required cn=Directory Manager and connects via the ldap uri. > > Ahh, and dsconf reads the .dsrc? Then I just picked the wrong tool, it seems. > > I was hoping to have a tool that gives me the status of a remote server or allows me to do healthchecks. Especially in Kubernetes, where entering the container is not something to be done on a daily basis. :-) > > I'll take a look at dsconf and see what it can do. > dsconf would be a better choice here as it can do some of these tasks. But some of the healthchecks do need local filesystem access which is why they are in dsctl. >> dsidm - requires a bind dn with no aci's or limited write aci's in a backend and connects via ldap uri. > > dsidm does not read .dscrc, at least the manpage does not mention it. Does it have a config file? Or do I need to supply the connection information each time? dsidm reads .dsrc the same as dsconf :) > > Kind Regards > Johannes > > -- > Johannes Kastl > Linux Consultant & Trainer > Tel.: +49 (0) 151 2372 5802 > Mail: kastl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > B1 Systems GmbH > Osterfeldstraße 7 / 85088 Vohburg > http://www.b1-systems.de > GF: Ralph Dehner > Unternehmenssitz: Vohburg / AG: Ingolstadt,HRB 3537 > > _______________________________________________ > 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Sincerely, William Brown Senior Software Engineer, Identity and Access Management SUSE Labs, Australia _______________________________________________ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue