We have several instances of 389-Directory (1.4.4.17), and are considering a move to Red Hat Directory Server 12.
The implementation in question has a single read-write instance,
with several read-only replicas. We could hail mary the whole
thing to RHDS, but the thought of that gives me deep shivers. I'd
prefer to (one by one) change out the replicas, letting the new
RHDS instances be populated from the existing 389-Directory
instance.
Are 389-->RHDS replication agreements even possible?
Alternatively, are RHDS-->389 replication agreements possible?
-- -- Do things because you should, not just because you can. John Thurston 907-465-8591 John.Thurston@xxxxxxxxxx Department of Administration State of Alaska
_______________________________________________ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue