Re: Wrong password hash algorithm returned

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Thierry,

that's a nasty catch…

On the one hand I think this is a nice feature to improve security, but on the other hand PBKDF2_SHA256 is the one algorithm that freeradius cannot cope with.

I suppose there is no way to revert all changed hashes after I set "nsslapd-enable-upgrade-hash" to "off"? Other than to reinitialize all affected suffixes from the export of the old servers?

Julian

Am 22.11.22 um 09:56 schrieb Thierry Bordaz:
Hi Julian,

This is likely the impact of https://github.com/389ds/389-ds-base/issues/2480 that was introduced in 1.4.x.

On 1.4.4 default hash is PBKDF2, this ticket upgrade hash of user entries during the user bind (enabled with nsslapd-enable-upgrade-hash).

best regards
thierry

On 11/22/22 09:25, Julian Kippels wrote:
Hi,

We have a radius server that reads the userPassword-attribute from ldap to authenticate users. There is a strange phenomenon where sometimes the answer from the ldap-server gives the wrong password hash algorithm. Our global password policy storage scheme is set to SSHA. When I perform a ldapsearch as directory manager I see that the password hash for a given user is {SSHA}inserthashedpasswordhere. But when I run tcpdump to see what our radius is being served I see {PBKDF2_SHA256}someotherhash around 50% of the time. Sometime another request from radius a few seconds after the first one gives the correct {SSHA} response.

This happened right after we updated from 389ds 1.2.2 to 1.4.4.
I am a bit stumped.

Thanks in advance,
Julian
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux