Hi Morgan,
389 1.3 and 1.4 are both advisable in production. You may hit some
dependencies difficulties building 1.4 on centos7, as 1.3 was released
on centos7 and 1.4 on centos8.
I would suggest that you upgrade to centos8 as 1.4 contains more
features and improvements but if you target centos7 then 1.3 is the
version to go.
my 2cts
regards
thierry
On 11/10/21 4:18 AM, Morgan Jones wrote:
Hello!
Is it advisable to run 389 1.3 in production?
If not is there a suggested way to install 1.4 in CentOS 7? On first blush to install 389 from source it’s looking like I’m going to need to install libicu from source, the version that ships is an older version:
checking for ICU... no
configure: error: Package requirements (icu-i18n >= 60.2) were not met:
Requested 'icu-i18n >= 60.2' but version of icu-i18n is 50.2
thank you,
-morgan
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
