I was looking at the RH DS docs and found this page on enabling auto tuning of threads
It mentions DS 10.11. Does anyone know if that covers the version of 389 DS I'm running: 389-Directory/1.3.9.1 B2019.164.1418?
Thanks,
Trev
On Tue, 24 Dec 2019 at 08:37, Trevor Fong <tjfong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Also,
It could be a temporary situation caused by some long running searches; I'm crawling the logs, but they're volumous and trying to make correspondences between 4 servers is confusing and time consuming. I'm sure I'm missing stuff. Would you have any advice on what to check for?
Those 4 hubs are fronted by a load-balancer.
nsslapd-enable-nunc-stans is off
The servers involved aren't hanging, just some connections intermittently; other connections still happen fine while the one that hangs waits for timeout, so taking a pstack or gdb won't necessarily show anything.
> check for LDAP server descriptors and system entropy.
How do I go about checking on this?
Thanks,
Trev
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
