Re: Problem with ldapsearch and scope one in 1.4.0.20

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 4:52 AM William Brown <wbrown@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 23 Jan 2019, at 02:01, Mihai Carabas <mihai.carabas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Helllo,
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:45 AM Ludwig <lkrispen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> The issue you are reporting does match exactly the issue in #49443, but
> >> this was fixed and the fix is in current master. Also I cannot reproduce
> >> it in current master and not with 1.4.20 -
> >>
> >> So this is a bit weird. Can you share a bit more of your data, eg
> >> provide all entries below ou=DPPD dn and ou attribute, do you have an
> >> index for ou ?
> >
> > Those are all _direct_ entries under ou=DPPD:
> > # extended LDIF
> > #
> > # LDAPv3
> > # base <ou=DPPD,ou=People,dc=curs,dc=pub,dc=ro> with scope oneLevel
> > # filter: (objectclass=*)
> > # requesting: ALL
> > #
> >
> > # Profesori, DPPD, People, curs.pub.ro
> > dn: ou=Profesori,ou=DPPD,ou=People,dc=curs,dc=pub,dc=ro
> > objectClass: top
> > objectClass: organizationalunit
> > ou: ou=Profesori
> > ou: Profesori
> >
> > # Asistenti-Man, DPPD, People, curs.pub.ro
> > dn: ou=Asistenti-Man,ou=DPPD,ou=People,dc=curs,dc=pub,dc=ro
> > objectClass: top
> > objectClass: organizationalunit
> > ou: ou=Asistenti-Man
> > ou: Asistenti-Man
> >
> > # Profesori-Man, DPPD, People, curs.pub.ro
> > dn: ou=Profesori-Man,ou=DPPD,ou=People,dc=curs,dc=pub,dc=ro
> > objectClass: top
> > objectClass: organizationalunit
> > ou: ou=Profesori-Man
> > ou: Profesori-Man
> >
> > # Externi, DPPD, People, curs.pub.ro
> > dn: ou=Externi,ou=DPPD,ou=People,dc=curs,dc=pub,dc=ro
> > objectClass: top
> > objectClass: organizationalunit
> > ou: ou=Externi
> > ou: Externi
> >
> > # Auxiliari, DPPD, People, curs.pub.ro
> > dn: ou=Auxiliari,ou=DPPD,ou=People,dc=curs,dc=pub,dc=ro
> > objectClass: top
> > objectClass: organizationalunit
> > ou: Auxiliari
> >
> > # search result
> > search: 2
> > result: 0 Success
> >
> > # numResponses: 6
> > # numEntries: 5
> >
> >
> > But for out=ACS, the filter is working:
> > # extended LDIF
> > #
> > # LDAPv3
> > # base <ou=ACS,ou=People,dc=curs,dc=pub,dc=ro> with scope oneLevel
> > # filter: ou=Profesori
> > # requesting: ALL
> > #
> >
> > # Profesori, ACS, People, curs.pub.ro
> > dn: ou=Profesori,ou=ACS,ou=People,dc=curs,dc=pub,dc=ro
> > objectClass: top
> > objectClass: organizationalunit
> > ou: ou=Profesori
> > ou: Profesori
> >
> > # search result
> > search: 2
> > result: 0 Success
> >
> > # numResponses: 2
> > # numEntries: 1
> >
> > This is very wierd. I have an index for ou.
> >
>
> This is indeed weird. Do you have the access log for this search operation? Can you please provide it?
>
[23/Jan/2019:09:01:00.759258088 +0200] conn=208222 fd=71 slot=71
connection from 141.85.241.48 to 141.85.241.48
[23/Jan/2019:09:01:00.759495689 +0200] conn=208222 op=0 BIND
dn="cn=directory manager" method=128 version=3
[23/Jan/2019:09:01:00.759638289 +0200] conn=208222 op=0 RESULT err=0
tag=97 nentries=0 etime=0.0000258701 dn="cn=directory manager"
[23/Jan/2019:09:01:00.760046290 +0200] conn=208222 op=1 SRCH
base="ou=DPPD,ou=People,dc=curs,dc=pub,dc=ro" scope=1
filter="(ou=Profesori)" attrs=ALL
[23/Jan/2019:09:01:00.760605892 +0200] conn=208222 op=1 RESULT err=0
tag=101 nentries=5 etime=0.0000696102
[23/Jan/2019:09:01:00.761964296 +0200] conn=208222 op=2 UNBIND
[23/Jan/2019:09:01:00.761988896 +0200] conn=208222 op=2 fd=71 closed - U1

> Additionally, have you been able to reproduce this in a new instance? Or only on your “current” instance.
>
Honestly I did not.

One particular thing is that I have upgraded my Fedora25 step-by-step
(I went through each version) and also 389-ds was upgraded. The
dataset would contain old metadata from the old version of 389-ds?

Thank you,
Mihai

> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
> William Brown
> Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
> SUSE Labs
> _______________________________________________
> 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [EPEL Announce]     [Fedora News]     [Fedora Cloud]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Education]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Scitech]     [Fedora Robotics]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Infrastructure]     [Fedora Websites]     [Anaconda Devel]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora Fonts]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Management Tools]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora R Devel]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Fedora Legal]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora QA]     [Fedora Triage]     [Fedora OCaml]     [Coolkey]     [Virtualization Tools]     [ET Management Tools]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Linux Apps]     [Maemo Users]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Maemo Users]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Fedora Sparc]     [Fedora Universal Network Connector]     [Fedora ARM]

  Powered by Linux