Another master > On Dec 6, 2017, at 11:01 AM, Viktor Ashirov <vashirov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 06 2017 at 10:53:49 -0600, Sergei Gerasenko <gerases@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> 389-ds-base-1.3.5.10-21.el7_3.x86_64. I do see errors like: >> >> connection - conn=1414256 fd=745 Incoming BER Element was too long, max allowable is 2097152 bytes. Change the nsslapd-maxbersize attribute in cn=config to increase. > Is this connection coming from the other master? Or some client > connection? >> >> >>> On Dec 6, 2017, at 10:47 AM, Viktor Ashirov <vashirov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> On Wed, Dec 06 2017 at 10:34:05 -0600, Sergei Gerasenko <gerases@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I just discovered that I have a mismatch of BER sizes (nsslapd-maxbersize) between some of my masters. On the masters that we consider the authorative ones, the BER size is (cough, cough) 209M while in the rest of the environment is the default 2M. I do see occasional errors on the 2M masters complaining and suggesting to increase the BER size. A couple of questions: >>>> >>>> 1. If the BER size of the supplier exceeds that of the consumer, will it be automatically split into smaller chunks or will the update just fail without any retries? >>>> 2. Should I match the BER size accross the environment? I think it’s obvious, but still asking just in case. >>> What version of 389-ds-base do you have? BER size should be ignored [1] >>> in replication in versions >=389-ds-base-1.3.5.2-1.el7 >>> >>> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223510 >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> Sergei >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
